election

election

PLP’s second term begins under a cloud of corruption questions instead of celebration

Just days after securing a second consecutive election victory, the Progressive Liberal Party is already confronting what could become one of the most politically dangerous moments of its new term—a growing corruption crisis.

According to the Tribune, the explosive revelations in newly released US court documents have shifted the national conversation almost immediately after the May 12 general election.

Instead of discussing Cabinet appointments, government priorities and the PLP’s renewed mandate, the public attention is now consumed by allegations involving a “high-ranking Bahamian politician,” an international drug trafficking network and corruption tied to government institutions.

This alone is politically damaging.

According to a DEA affidavit filed in the Southern District of New York, an alleged meeting involving a politician and individuals believed to be tied to a drug smuggling operation reportedly took place inside the Parliament building in October 2024. No politician has been publicly identified or charged. Still, the mere suggestion of Parliament being connected to allegations involving cocaine trafficking and organized crime is devastating for the Bahamas and the Davis administration.

The timing could not be worse for Prime Minister Philip Davis.

Throughout the election campaign, the PLP already faced criticism over transparency, accountability, procurement concerns and public trust.

While voters ultimately returned the party to office, these new allegations will reopen many of those same concerns almost immediately in the government’s second term.

The documents also reignite questions about how convicted drug smuggler Jonathan Gardiner allegedly secured major government contracts after being deported back to the Bahamas following imprisonment in the United States.

According to Tribune reports, Gardiner, after the plane crash, was reportedly carrying a cross-body bag containing three mobile phones, a small amount of cash and an envelope stuffed with $30,000 in Bahamian currency bearing the handwritten label of a politician. According to the DEA, the money was packaged in a manner “consistent with narcotics proceeds,” raising further questions in an already explosive international drug trafficking investigation.

What Jonathan Gardiner had when he was rescued after the crash that happened on Tuesday. (NBC 6 Florida)
The rescue by US Air Force
Plane crash survivor faces U.S. cocaine trafficking charges
Prosecutors say Gardiner helped move cocaine from Colombia through the Bahamas, supplying U.S. drug organizations, including one in Georgia, dating back from 2023

This creates suspicion around the Davis administration.

The matter also risks international consequences. With the DEA and US federal prosecutors involved, scrutiny on the Bahamas’ anti-corruption systems, law enforcement institutions and political culture will intensify abroad.

What comes next may determine if this is a defining crisis of the Davis administration’s second term.

If more names emerge, investigations expand, or further evidence surfaces, the PLP could find itself spending the opening months of its second term defending its credibility instead of governing.

Can casino power truly be separated from Cabinet power?

The appointments of Sebas Bastian and Leslia Miller-Brice to the Cabinet following the May 12 general election are already raising a deeper national question on whether or not casino and gaming operators can truly separate business influence from public office.

Bastian, founder of Island Luck, said he stepped down as CEO in March 2026 before becoming Minister of Innovation and National Development. Meanwhile, Leander Brice, husband of newly appointed Minister of Culture Leslia Miller-Brice, reportedly stepped down as CEO of Sure Win shortly before her appointment.

The Gaming Act bars Cabinet ministers and their close family members from holding gaming licences.

Technically, those resignations may satisfy the legal requirements surrounding gaming interests and Cabinet appointments, according to the PLP government. But politically and ethically, it raises questions.

The bigger issue evolves into influence and public trust.

Bastian and Brice, as gaming operators hold enormous influence in the Bahamas. They are tied to money, business networks and donor ships. Many now question whether stepping away from an executive title removes the relationships, influence and access built over years inside the industry.

Even if Bastian and Brice are no longer formally connected to gaming management positions, many Bahamians still wonder whether the spirit of the Gaming Act was intended to create a wider separation between gaming influence and political power altogether.

The appointments opened Prime Minister Philip Davis to accusations of inconsistency. In 2025, Davis publicly said amending the law to allow Cabinet ministers with gaming interests was “not on the table,” creating the impression that Bastian and Brice would remain separated from Cabinet.

Now, many see a contradiction between Davis’ earlier comments and the optics of these appointments.

The appointments raise important questions about where the line between gaming business power and political power should truly be drawn in the Bahamas.

The young candidate who taught a big political lesson

One of the quietest but most meaningful stories to emerge from the May 12 general election may be the rise of Lincoln Deal.

Young, relatively new to frontline politics and largely untested on a national level, Deal defeated one of the government’s most senior figures—Wayne Munroe, by just 68 votes to capture Free Town for the Free National Movement.

Munroe was not an ordinary opponent. He served as Minister of National Security and Leader of Government Business in the House of Assembly, making him one of the most visible and powerful members of the Progressive Liberal Party.

Yet it was Deal, a newcomer with far less national stature, who emerged victorious.

The win sends a powerful lesson—in Bahamian politics, title, seniority and status do not guarantee political survival if voters become emotionally connected to a fresh face and a grounded campaign message.

What makes Deal’s story even more interesting is that Free Town was not originally where many expected him to run.

Initially, he had already begun campaigning in Killarney against former Prime Minister Hubert Minnis, who later broke with the FNM and chose to run as an independent after not being renominated by party leader Michael Pintard.

But when the party shifted Deal to Free Town and instead ratified Michaela Barnett-Ellis for Killarney, Deal accepted the move without public resistance.

At his ratification, he made clear that his mission to run was never about personal territory or political ego.

“It’s about serving the people,” he said. “Whether you live in the east, the west or in the islands, our concerns are still the same.”

While many politicians become attached to a constituency, Deal’s willingness to go where the party placed him—and still build enough trust to defeat a senior Cabinet minister, may have become one of the clearest examples of discipline and adaptability in this election.

In the end, both decisions worked. Deal captured Free Town, while Barnett-Ellis defeated Minnis in Killarney.

Perhaps the bigger lesson of Deal’s victory is that sometimes growth and advancement do not come from demanding your own path, but from being willing to serve wherever you are planted.

Travis Robinson beat a giant once. This time, his luck ran out.

In 2017, Travis Robinson pulled off one of the most shocking political upsets in modern Bahamian history.

Young, relatively unknown and politically underestimated, he walked into Bain and Grants Town—a constituency long viewed as loyal territory for the Progressive Liberal Party, and defeated political heavyweight Bernard Nottage.

At the time, Robinson looked like a political David defeating a giant.

Nearly a decade later, history presented him with another giant. But this time, the outcome was different.

On May 12, Robinson, running for the Free National Movement in Fort Charlotte, lost to PLP candidate Sebas Bastian—a wealthy businessman and Number House and casino operator whose financial strength became one of the defining stories of the race.

Bastian entered the election with enormous financial reach and political visibility. Declaring a reported net worth of $28.9 million, he was among the wealthiest candidates contesting the 2026 general election. In political conversations, many viewed him as a “giant” because of the scale of resources behind his campaign.

Robinson, by contrast, again found himself cast as the underdog.

His declared wealth stood at $598,000—a figure that reflected steady personal and political growth since entering politics. In 2017, he reported just $7,300 as a university student. By 2021, that figure had climbed to $147,000.

But while Robinson’s political campaign was built around resilience, grassroots politics and relatability, this race proved far more difficult terrain.

He secured more than 1,600 votes this time, while Bastian got more than 3,300 votes.

Unlike 2017, when national political momentum strongly favoured the FNM and anti-PLP sentiment was high, Robinson entered the 2026 race in a different environment, one where PLP incumbency, party machinery and financial power carried significant weight.

And although Robinson campaigned heavily on “integrity and people,” insisting the campaign was rooted in honesty, conviction and heart, it was not enough to overcome the political and financial force assembled behind Bastian.

The result may now mark an important reality in Robinson’s political career: defeating one giant made him a political phenomenon, but defeating another proved far more difficult.

Has the FNM finally gotten rid of its political headache?

For years after the Free National Movement lost the 2021 general election, one reality lingered over the party like a constant pain in the neck: Hubert Minnis never fully went away.

Now, after losing the Killarney constituency as an independent candidate in the 2026 election to FNM standard bearer Michaela Barnett-Ellis, that chapter may have finally closed.

Minnis’ defeat may represent the end of a long internal struggle that weighed on the FNM’s image, unity and ability to fully move forward under leader Michael Pintard.

After the FNM’s heavy defeat in 2021, many party supporters blamed Minnis for the loss, particularly over public dissatisfaction with his administration’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet instead of stepping quietly out of frontline politics, Minnis appeared determined to remain relevant.

He challenged Pintard for leadership of the party, maintained visible support within sections of the FNM and was frequently associated with perceptions of internal division. Allegations circulated for years that he distanced himself from party meetings while some supporters openly undermined Pintard’s authority.

For many observers, the optics became damaging.

At a time when the FNM was attempting to rebuild, reset its image and present unity to voters, the continued Minnis-Pintard tension often created the impression that the party was still fighting itself internally.

That tension escalated further when Minnis, after not being renominated by the FNM for Killarney in 2026, chose to run against his own party as an independent candidate.

To critics within the FNM, it reinforced long-standing concerns that the former Prime Minister was unwilling to release his grip on frontline politics or fully accept the party’s transition to new leadership.

Now, after losing decisively to Barnett-Ellis, many may see the result as a message because for the first time since 2021, the FNM may finally feel free of the internal shadow that has continued hanging over it.

Whether Minnis accepts that message and exits frontline politics altogether remains to be seen.

His defeat may have finally removed one of the party’s longest-running headaches.

The election’s biggest shock? They won anyway.

When the dust settled after the May 12 general election, some of the most surprising results were those who survived politically.

Several incumbents widely viewed as vulnerable heading into the election, managed to hold onto their seats, despite criticism, controversy, shifting voter moods and constituencies known for political swings.

Among them were Myles Laroda, Michael Darville, Patricia Deveaux, Wayde Watson, McKell Bonaby, Leonardo Lightbourne, Sylvanus Petty, Kirk Cornish and newcomer Obie Roberts.

Many expected at least some of those seats to flip.

Incumbency and Progressive Liberal Party structure may have mattered more than anti-government frustrations in some constituencies.

Laroda entered the election still facing criticism over unresolved flooding problems that have frustrated residents for years. Pinewood has historically been a swing seat, frequently changing major parties depending on the national mood. Yet voters returned him for a second term.

Tall Pines presented another surprise. Darville faced sustained criticism over the state of healthcare nationally, an issue directly tied to his ministerial portfolio. The constituency itself has a history of moving between parties. Still, he survived and secured a second consecutive term.

In Bamboo Town, Deveaux was widely criticized by opponents and online commentators, with many believing she was one of the more vulnerable incumbents. Yet she retained the seat.

Bonaby also overcame political pressure tied to allegations surrounding the Beaches and Parks Authority, where he served as chairman. Despite the controversy, many constituents continued to describe him as a strong member of parliament.

Some victories came from seats many believed were temporary PLP gains after the 2021 backlash against the Hubert Minnis administration’s handling of COVID-19.

Petty held North Eleuthera again despite the constituency’s long-standing FNM history. Cornish also survived as a backbencher, many thought would only serve one term.

Meanwhile, Leonardo Lightbourne retained support in North Andros and the Berry Islands even as FNM challenger Janice Oliver appeared to gain strong momentum throughout the campaign.

Southern Shores may have produced one of the election’s most unexpected outcomes. Many believed FNM candidate Denalee Penn had the advantage because of long-term constituency work, and name recognition. But the race became complicated after incumbent Leroy Major ran as an independent following his previous PLP victory there.

In the end, Obie Roberts emerged victorious in a constituency known for constantly shifting political directions.

Philip Davis just pulled a Mia Mottley

For years, in Bahamian politics, incumbent governments rarely survived consecutive terms.

Prime Minister Philip Davis just broke that pattern.

Despite entering the election under political pressure—from rising cost-of-living concerns and healthcare frustrations to accusations surrounding transparency, procurement and governance, voter fraud allegations—the Progressive Liberal Party leader secured another term as prime minister.

“Tonight is a political victory, but this is truly a victory for the whole country,” he said. “For the first time in almost a generation, we have a historic opportunity. Let us make the most of it,” Davis said after the win.

“I will begin our second term as I began the first with a humble spirit and with a heart full of gratitude. Thank you for your trust and faith in me. I will not let you down.”

Davis accomplished something modern Bahamian politics has not seen since 1997. Former Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham won back-to-back in 1997.

Davis’ feat is similar to the achievement of Mia Mottley, the Barbadian PM who turned electoral success into sustained political strength, surviving three elections while maintaining public confidence and regional stature.

For months, some mocked suggestions that Davis was attempting to emulate Mottley’s style of political endurance. There are now undeniable similarities. Both leaders faced economic pressures and public frustration while arguing that continuity and stability were ‘safer’ choices.

This election could be a shift in Bahamian political behaviour.

Did voters decide stability mattered more than their frustrations? Did the opposition fail to convince enough Bahamians that change was necessary? Or has Davis quietly built a stronger political machine?

Davis’ win could reshape future elections.

He won despite the recent pressure that many believed would weaken his administration.

Davis may not govern exactly like Mia Mottley, but politically, he may have just accomplished something very similar, surviving the storm and convincing voters to stay the course.

Nassau Village has a habit of changing its mind: Can Jamahl Strachan survive?

No candidate running on the ticket for the Nassau Village constituency can afford to get comfortable.

Incumbent Jamahl Strachan of the Progressive Liberal Party will attempt to hold the seat against Gadville McDonald of the Free National Movement and Coalition of Independents candidate Stephen McQueen.

In 2021, Strachan secured the constituency with 2,075 votes, comfortably ahead of the FNM candidate at the time, who received 1,016 votes. The Coalition of Independents candidate earned 324 votes.

But Nassau Village does not have long-term loyalty to a political party.

In 2012, the seat was held by PLP MP Dion Smith. By 2017, it flipped to the FNM under Halson Moultrie. Four years later, the PLP reclaimed it through Strachan.

As incumbent, Strachan benefits from familiarity and the advantages of governing-party machinery, but he must also defend his party’s overall record at a time when cost-of-living concerns, frustration and political fatigue are in every voter debate.

For the FNM, Nassau Village represents another opportunity to capitalize on the swing-seat pattern. The challenge for McDonald will be convincing voters that the constituency should once again shift direction.

Meanwhile, McQueen’s candidacy may become a real test of whether frustration with the two-party system can move beyond online discussion and turn into votes at the polls. Third parties in The Bahamas have historically struggled to break through, but in constituencies where margins tighten and voter dissatisfaction rises, even smaller numbers can influence the outcome.

FNM sees opportunity in open Abaco seat

Central and South Abaco could be one of the more unpredictable races of the May 12 election because there is no incumbent.

Former Progressive Liberal Party MP John Pinder, who won the constituency in 2021, is not returning to defend the seat. Instead, the PLP has placed its hopes in candidate Bradley Fox, who will face Jeremy Sweeting of the Free National Movement and Coalition of Independents candidate Crystal Williams.

In 2021, Pinder secured the seat with 766 votes, narrowly defeating the FNM’s candidate, who received 693 votes. The Coalition of Independents candidate got 258 votes.

The close margin in 2021 can suggest this constituency is competitive.

Historically, the constituency has leaned toward the FNM. From 2007 to 2012, and again in 2017, the seat was represented by FNM MPs, including Edison Key and later James Albury. That may give the FNM confidence that the seat is recoverable, particularly in an election where the national mood and turnout could heavily influence swing constituencies.

For the PLP, the challenge will be proving that support for the party in 2021 was not tied solely to Pinder personally, but can be transferred to Fox.

Meanwhile, the Coalition of Independents faces the same challenge that confronts most third-party movements in Bahamian politics, turning frustration into actual victory. Winning seats outright remains difficult in a political system still dominated by the PLP and FNM.

Incumbents on the edge: Who’s at risk in May 12 Bahamas election

As the Bahamas heads toward May 12, incumbents across the political spectrum are under pressure.

A long list of sitting MPs—including Myles Laroda, Michael Darville, Patricia Deveaux, Wayde Watson, Wayne Munroe, Keith Bell, Fred Mitchell and others– are defending seats that are far from secure.

The reason is that many of these constituencies are not traditional strongholds but are swing seats.

In Bahamian politics, swing seats are constituencies that regularly shift between the Progressive Liberal Party and Free National Movement depending on the national mood, turnout and the strength of the candidate.

That means incumbency alone may not be enough to survive a changing political climate.

Several seats now appear especially vulnerable.

North Eleuthera, for example, historically leans FNM. Incumbent Sylvanus Petty broke that pattern in 2021, but the constituency’s voting history suggests the FNM could reclaim it this election cycle.

Southern Shores presents another complicated dynamic. Incumbent Leroy Major is now running as an independent after previously winning under the PLP banner. But constituencies that frequently flip between the PLP and FNM are often difficult for independents, particularly without major party machinery behind them.

The same challenge faces Hubert Minnis in Killarney. While Minnis is now contesting the election as an independent candidate, potentially weakening the advantage that once supported him, the seat has historically remained loyal to the FNM.

Meanwhile, Iram Lewis faces a difficult path in Central Grand Bahama after leaving the FNM to run with the Coalition of Independents in an area traditionally dominated by the FNM base.

May 12 may be about whether incumbents can survive in constituencies where loyalty to party is temporary and the national mood changes quickly.