Days after Parliament was prorogued, the Progressive Liberal Party has moved quickly to install large-scale signs pairing the party’s candidates with Prime Minister Philip Davis.
On the surface, it may seem like a simple design choice, but it is a party strategy.
Traditionally, campaign signs show the individual candidate of the constituency. This time, there is a change, placing Davis prominently alongside candidates. The PLP appears to be nationalizing the election, turning constituency races into a broader referendum on Davis’ leadership.
The message is clear that a vote for the PLP candidate is a vote for Davis.
There are advantages to this strategy. Davis, as incumbent prime minister, carries authority. For new, lesser-known or weaker candidates, closeness to the leader can transfer voter perceived credibility and trust. It also creates a unified campaign image of one party, one message and one face.
But the strategy is also risky.
When the PLP campaign leans heavily on Davis, if voters are dissatisfied with Davis, it can ripple across constituencies, negatively impacting candidates who might otherwise stand on their own record or constituency appeal.
It also raises a deeper question about how voters make decisions.
Are Bahamians voting for the PLP candidate on the ballot or Davis behind them?
With Parliament prorogued and the country edging closer to an election, the PLP is framing the choice before the election is formally announced.





Despite its high cases of infection in the country, the Free National Movement found a new way to reach its supporters. The party supporters waved pom-poms from their car windows, blew the car horns in support of their candidates, while others danced while social distancing from others.
Minnis praised the “decisive leadership” of his government.