The Bahamas’ new Smuggling of Migrants Bill sparked debate across the country, particularly because of Clause 11, which addresses the immunity of migrants, which was eventually removed following public backlash. However, one word in the bill has caused more confusion: Non-refoulement.
Here’s the breakdown of what it actually means and why it matters now more than ever.
What non-refoulement means
Non-refoulement is a human rights term that says a country must not send a person back to a place where their life or safety is at serious risk.
The bill defines it as a ban against returning someone to a country where they may face: torture, persecution, serious danger, inhuman treatment and life-threatening conditions.
These protections apply specifically when a migrant is being smuggled and is intercepted by Bahamian authorities.
If a migrant boat is intercepted off Inagua, under non-refoulement, Bahamian authorities must ask:
- Will sending them back expose them to danger?
If yes, they cannot be immediately returned. If no, they can be repatriated as usual.
- Are they fleeing political violence, persecution, or threats to life?
If yes, the migrant qualifies for protected status under international law.
- Are they being exploited or abused by smugglers?
If so, they are treated as victims under the Act.
READ MORE: The principle of non-refoulement under international human rights law
Human rights activists say non-refoulement does not give automatic citizenship, permanent residency, and that migrants cannot be repatriated.





