The controversy surrounding McKell Bonaby is about the $141 million spent under his watch at the Bahamas Public Parks and Public Beaches Authority, and about credibility and accountability.
When the Progressive Liberal Party came to government, Bonaby criticized spending under Shanendon Cartwright, the previous chairman of the authority, which was $84,288,232 over four years in office. The PLP framed it as misuse and even suggested the Authority was being treated like a “slush fund.” That framing set a high bar for transparency and discipline on their part.
Now, with even higher levels of spending under Bonaby’s tenure, what standard is being applied today?
After months of long silences and avoiding the press on the issue, Bonaby now argues that the funds have been used to build capacity and stimulate economic activity through small contractors. But many Bahamians see the poor condition of public parks in many communities and unclean streets.
This creates a credibility gap. If spending has significantly increased, but the public can not see any visible results, and many are asking just how much was spent and how effectively the money was used.
Another layer of concern is transparency. Without clear, accessible accounting made public, Bahamians are left to rely on Bonaby’s assurances rather than evidence.
This fuels suspicion and a vacuum where trust should be.
Ultimately, this says more about Bonaby’s leadership style. Leadership at his level requires demonstrating results and maintaining public confidence.
The primary questions are, where did the money go, and does the public believe Bonaby, whatever his response may be, just now?
Featured Pictures: The Nassau Guardian