killarney

killarney

Chester Cooper says new constituencies are fair, but could it be ‘gerrymandering’?

As the 2026 General Election draws near, the creation of two new constituencies, Bimini & Berry Islands and St. James has sparked questions about fairness in voting. Deputy Prime Minister Chester Cooper says the changes are meant to balance voter numbers. But some critics are asking: Is this gerrymandering?

What is gerrymandering?

Gerrymandering is when political boundaries are drawn in a way that gives an advantage to one party over another. It usually involves “packing” voters of one type into a single area or “cracking” them across several areas to dilute their influence. The goal is to shape election results, sometimes at the expense of fair representation.

What’s happening?

The government says St. James was created by combining parts of Golden Isles and Killarney because those areas had far more voters than average, around 15,000–16,000, compared to the roughly 5,000 voters in most constituencies. On the surface, this looks like an effort to make voting more equal.

But critics say timing matters. The new boundaries come just before an election, which naturally raises questions about whether the changes could favor certain parties or candidates. While there is no clear evidence of political manipulation yet, the situation highlights why transparency in boundary decisions is important.

Why it matters to voters

For everyday citizens, gerrymandering can affect whose voices are heard in Parliament and how much influence your vote carries. Understanding these changes helps voters hold leaders accountable.

Balanced representation is key to a healthy democracy and voters have a right to know how the lines are drawn.

What happens when the FNM says ‘No’ — and Wells and Minnis run anyway?

When a political party denies a nomination, the expectation is usually simple: the candidate steps aside. But in this election, two high-profile figures inside the Free National Movement (FNM) are choosing a different path.

Former Bamboo Town MP and Minister of Health Renward Wells, and former Prime Minister Hubert Minnis, both denied FNM nominations, have confirmed they will still appear on the ballot in their respective constituencies, Wells in Bamboo Town and Minnis in Killarney, as independents.

Click here to watch Renward Wells’ announcement and intention to run in Bamboo Town

Both men are longtime FNM members. Both are close allies. And both are widely seen as critical of the current party leadership under Michael Pintard.

FNM authority vs Wells and Minnis personal mandate

Executives of political parties select, endorse, and discipline candidates. The FNM made its position clear when it ratified Dr. Duane Sands as its official candidate for Bamboo Town just before Christmas, while Michaela Barnett was ratified in Killarney.

From a party standpoint, that should have settled the matter.

But Wells and Minnis appear to be advancing a different argument: that their legitimacy does not come solely from party approval, but from their relationships with constituents. They are challenging the idea that party leadership has the final say over who represents a constituency.

Click here to watch FNM Leader Michael Pintard’s response to Renward Wells’ announcement

Are they splitting the vote?

The two men may be acting in concert, possibly to weaken the FNM by drawing votes away from its ratified candidates. In tight races, even a modest number of votes siphoned off by an independent can reshape the outcome.

At the same time, there is no clear evidence that either Wells or Minnis currently commands overwhelming support in their constituencies. Yet both remain publicly defiant.

That persistence could suggest their motivations may be beyond voter numbers.

Their democratic rights cause tension

On one hand, Wells and Minnis are exercising their legal right to run. No party can block a citizen from seeking office. On the other hand, parties exist precisely to organize candidates under a shared strategy.

When a party says no, and candidates run anyway, it is a test of political authority. It forces voters to decide whether loyalty belongs to the party brand (FNM) or to individual personalities.

Will He or Won’t He? Minnis Makes it Emphatically Clear

Former Prime Minister Hubert Minnis has teased the public on the possibility that he will run for leadership of the Free National Movement on November 27 when the party holds a one-day convention.

When the question was put to him by reporters, Minnis never directly answered the question only to say he would let God guide his next step.

This caused speculations that Minnis would run for party leadership despite stating that he would not after the party lost the majority of its seats in the early election on September 16.

Minnis today is stating emphatically that he “will not nominate for the leadership nor will I allow my name to be placed in nomination,” he said in a statement.

This comes as a surprising move after former Prime Minister Hubert Minnis told reporters that he found it interesting that people were still questioning whether Minnis will seek re-election for the leadership of the party.

Ingraham said on Friday morning, “It is clear to me that the current leader of the FNM will no longer be the leader of the FNM after the convention on November 27, and he has already told us he is not running for the office anymore.

“The party has determined it will hold a one-day convention with the sole purpose of electing a leader. That’s what is going to happen.

“I shall be there, God willing, and so will others in the party,” Ingraham said.

By afternoon, Minnis released this statement reassuring that he won’t seek re-election. Minnis added that he will continue in his role as a member of parliament for Killarney and “will support the work of the Official Opposition.”

Minnis has been described as a reneger by party insiders. He was accused of launching attacks inside the party on the leadership contenders and has been seeking party members’ support before the party goes to convention.