karenbutler

karenbutler

Back-to-back withdrawals: Is the Coalition of Independents facing early turbulence?

In the span of two weeks, two candidates from the Coalition of Independents have stepped aside.

Central and South Eleuthera candidate Christian Heastie withdrew, with the party stating that his decision was based on personal reasons. Just last week, Valentino McKenzie for St Barnabas also stepped aside, with the COI citing personal injury.

The party has ratified Karen Butler to replace McKenzie.

Individually, these developments may be explainable due to personal circumstances, health matters, and life events, which can understandably interrupt a political campaign.

Watch Christian Heastie at his COI debut

Politics, particularly during this season, demands time and resources.

But when two candidate withdrawals occur in succession, how it is perceived by the public matters.

For a third-party positioning itself as a serious alternative to the established political parties, stability and confidence are critical signs for voters.

Candidate departures, even for legitimate reasons, can raise questions about a party’s preparedness, support, and campaign sustainability.

Are these simply isolated incidents or do they reflect the pressures the COI now face?

Third parties often operate without the financial support, organisational experience, and institutional backing of the major parties. Candidates may find themselves navigating demanding campaigns with limited resources.

The COI now faces a perception challenge from voters. Replacing candidates quickly, as it has done with Karen Butler shows the party’s quick responsiveness, but repeated withdrawals can test public confidence.

As the election season approaches, voters will be watching the party’s unity and strength.

Who’s on top in the Golden Isles by-election?

With the Golden Isles by-election taking place on Monday, voters are not just choosing a candidate, but they are choosing between four very different political directions.

Brian Brown

On the Free National Movement side is Brian Brown, a familiar and deeply rooted candidate in the constituency. Brown previously served as campaign chair to the late Vaughn Miller, ran on the FNM ticket in 2021 and lost. But he kept his constituency office open and continued working on the ground.

Now, his candidacy has the full backing of former Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham.

Brown’s strongest appeal is his long-term presence and consistency. Supporters argue that he has already been serving the people, even without holding the seat.

Darron Pickstock

On the Progressive Liberal Party side is newcomer Darron Pickstock, who is campaigning on promises of upgrades to infrastructure, investment, and development. A PLP victory in Golden Isles would be seen as a strong public endorsement of Prime Minister Philip Davis’ leadership.

However, many critics question the timing of these promises, asking whether they came too late, and whether they would last beyond the campaign period.

Brian Rolle

Representing the Coalition of Independents (COI) is Brian Rolle, who is appealing to voters frustrated with the traditional two-party system. His message is rooted in empowerment, arguing that this election should be about returning power to the people, not political parties.

Karen Butler

Another independent candidate in the race is attorney Karen Butler, who is delivering a strong message about personal and economic independence. Butler said that no one’s livelihood should be tied to a political party, that Bahamians should not “eat when their party wins and starve when it loses.” Her message may resonate with voters who want fairness, and independence from party control.

So, who has the edge?

If voters prioritise history, familiarity, and loyalty to the constituency, Brian Brown appears strong.

If they lean towards governing power and future investment, Pickstock and the PLP could prevail.

If they want something different from the traditional political system, Rolle or Butler may prove to be the surprise and winning factor.

Voter turnout will certainly decide who wins.

Could the advance poll chaos spill over into November 24? The stakes are high

After Monday’s chaotic close to the advance poll, we saw blocked exits, shouting matches, party lawyers stepping in, accusations of secrecy, and the Returning Officer Neil Campbell insisting everything was done ‘by the book.’

It is possible the chaos could spill over to by-election day on November 24.

Here’s what you need to know:

The tension was a result of mistrust in the system and due to confusion over procedures. There were disagreements about the transport and storage of ballots, claims about who was allowed to accompany the ballots, and confusion about where the ballots would be stored. If these matters aren’t clarified publicly before Monday, the same blow-ups may happen again, this time with more people involved.

That mistrust won’t magically disappear in seven days. It likely will intensify when the stakes are higher, and by-election day is as high as it gets.

Both the FNM and COI have already said things were handled incorrectly. And Campbell said everything was handled properly and they obliged when the parties disagreed.

That means each side will walk into November 24 with their own version of what ‘fairness’ and ‘trust’ look like. When varied expectations clash without the same rulebook, conflict is almost guaranteed to happen.

This isn’t just about ballots anymore. It plays on voter trust.

When voters see political parties blocking cars and arguing with police, it raises a deeper question: Will the final result — no matter who wins — be accepted as legitimate? If that doubt grows, the by-election becomes even more volatile.

What happened at the advance poll can spill over into November 24, because of mistrust, confusion, and the high political temperature.

Can the Parliamentary Department restore confidence before it’s too late?

Featured Image: Our News

Who’s worth what? Brian Brown tops wealth list

In the run‑up to the November 24 by‑election for the Golden Isles seat, the three main candidates have filed their financial disclosures as required and the numbers show significant differences in declared wealth.

Among them, Brian Brown of the Free National Movement (FNM) emerges as the wealthiest contender.

  • Brown declared total assets of $2,627,657, an annual income of $139,000 and liabilities of $235,000, placing his net worth at approximately $2.39 million. His holdings include about $1.7 million in securities and investments, $780,000 in real estate and $50,000 in personal property.
  • Darron Pickstock of the Progressive Liberal Party (PLP), filing jointly with his wife, reported $1.72 million in total assets, $430,000 in combined income and $425,000 in liabilities, for a net worth of about $1.29 million. His disclosures include two properties valued at about $850,000 and securities around $200,000.
  • Brian Rolle of the Coalition of Independents (COI) declared total assets of $602,000, income of $37,000 and no liabilities, giving a net worth of $602,000. His assets include $65,000 in savings, a vehicle valued at $25,000, and personal property valued at $500,000.
  • Independent candidate Karen Kim Butler reported assets of $477,000, income of $54,500 and liabilities of $160,000 — resulting in a net worth of around $531,340. The filing lists two properties totaling $450,000, a motor vehicle valued at $20,000, and life insurance valued at $7,000.

These disclosures were made under the Parliamentary Elections Act ahead of the by‑election triggered by the death of the sitting MP, Vaughn Miller.

These numbers give voters a clear snapshot of the candidates’ financial positions, as the campaign intensifies in Golden Isles.

The financial disclosure is just one factor in the election.