The government’s new Smuggling of Migrants Bill was passed in Parliament on Monday. Still, only after a major controversy that forced the removal of Clause 11, a section critics said offered protection to migrants while only placing the full burden of punishment on the smugglers.
Clause 11 became the most debated part of the bill, causing public backlash and political pushback from Bahamians who believe both the smuggler and the smuggled should face consequences.
Here’s what Clause 11 actually said and why it was ultimately removed:
What clause 11 actually stated
Before it was struck from the bill, Clause 11 read:
“Without prejudice to the applicability of any other law establishing criminal offence, a smuggled migrant shall not be liable to criminal prosecution under this Act, in respect of —
(a) illegal entry into the receiving country or transit country;
(b) remaining illegally in the receiving country or transit country; or
(c) possessing a fraudulent travel or identity document, where such act is a direct consequence of the smuggling of the migrant … and the migrant is a victim of that criminal conduct.”
The clause appears to protect the smuggled migrants from prosecution under the new Act for:
- illegal entry into The Bahamas,
- remaining in the country illegally,
- and using fake documents
as long as those acts happened because they were being smuggled.
The clause positioned migrants primarily as victims of smuggling networks.
What critics said
The official Opposition, the Free National Movement led by Michael Pintard, and members of the Coalition of Independents, argued that Clause 11 imposes unequal accountability because it heavily punishes smugglers but shields smuggled migrants from prosecution under this Act. Many say this made the law one-sided.
“Kill the bill,” Pintard said. “Having been caught as they normally are caught, then they make adjustments, dry eye and not again with any full throated apology and repentance.”
They also said the clause is a potential “pull factor.” Some feared the clause could encourage migrants to willingly use smuggling routes, knowing they would face no legal consequence once in the Bahamas. And it conflicted with public sentiment. Bahamians said both the smuggler and the smuggled should be prosecuted.
What the government says after the clause was removed
Wayne Munroe, leader of government business in the House, said the government intends to reduce human smuggling in the country and strengthen the borders.
“As I have indicated, an [amendment] will be moved to delete section 11. We have heard the outcry. This is a responsive government. This government is responding by removing it. People had. A problem with there being immunity, it is being removed.”
Michael Pintard said he is pleased with the removal of clause 11 but the Opposition will not support the bill.
The bill, though, was passed by the government sometime after 8pm lastnight.





