A Supreme Court judge has cast doubt on the strength of the prosecution’s case against Michael Johnson, Bjorn Ferguson, and Sergeant Deangelo Rolle–three men accused of corruption in connection with a $1.4 million Bank of The Bahamas heist, after a forensic voice expert failed to link them to viral WhatsApp recordings that were important to the allegations.
What happened
According to the Nassau Guardian, Justice Dale Fitzpatrick questioned how prosecutors plan to prove their case against Johnson, the former head of CID, Ferguson, an attorney and Sergeant Rolle, saying, “I don’t know how the prosecution intends to prove its case.”
The case stems from the November 2023 theft of more than $1.4 million, allegedly stolen from a Toyota Harrier that was transporting money for the Bank of The Bahamas. Prosecutors claimed gang leader Fox, and others, bribed Johnson and Ferguson with part of the stolen money so that he wouldn’t face prosecution– and that the voice recordings circulating on WhatsApp tied the men to the crime.
But a forensic speech analyst from Lancaster University in the UK could not confirm that the voices belonged to the accused.
Why it matters
This development could severely weaken this high-profile corruption case and injure public trust in the justice system.
The judge said the analyst’s report “did the prosecution no good” and removed “a plank in the chain” of their argument.
The big picture
The expert confirmed the recordings were not AI-generated, but still couldn’t match them to Johnson, Ferguson, or Rolle.
The prosecution only plans to use the part of the report confirming the audio’s authenticity as not AI generated– but not the identity of individuals, a move the judge called “problematic.”
The DPP recently dropped charges against security guard Akeil Holmes, who was once accused of stealing the money and is now listed as their witness.
What’s next
The defense attorneys — including Murrio Ducille, KC, and Damian Gomez, KC — are likely to push for the case’s dismissal if prosecutors can’t establish a clear link between the recordings and the accused.
The bottom line
With no clear voice match, the prosecution’s case may be collapsing.


